Tata cellular v union of india
WebThe brief facts are as under. 3.The Department of Telecommunications, Government of India, invited tenders from Indian Companies with a view to license the operation of … WebJul 26, 1994 · This doctrine has come up for discussion in Charan Lal Sahu v. Union of India 1990 (1) SCC 613. 64. Whatever it may be, Indian Telecom cannot take the point of bias. It …
Tata cellular v union of india
Did you know?
WebIn Tata Cellular v. Union of India , {29} the Supreme Court stipulated that judicial review is concerned with reviewing not the merits of the decision but the decision-making process itself. If an administrative decision is allowed to be reviewed, it will replace its own decision which could be fallible by itself. Web•A. K. Kraipak v. Union of India(1969) •Ganga Bai Charities v. CIT (1992) •Tata Cellular v. Union of India (1994) •Kirti Deshmankar v. Union of India (1991) •S.P. Kapoor v. State of HP (1981) Official Bias/Departmental Bias •Gullapalli Nageswara Rao v. APSRTC(I) 1959
Web1 day ago · According to rumors, the Tata 1.2-liter turbo-petrol engine with 122 BHP and 225 Nm would power the Nexon facelift. It’s likely that the 1.5-liter diesel engine will remain as … WebWhile arriving at its decision, the Supreme Court heavily relied on its verdict in the case of Tata Cellular v. Union of India, wherein the Court had remarked that the terms of the …
Webv. Brojo Nath Ganguly, (1986) 3 SCC 156. He has also argued that arbitration being an alternative dispute resolution process, a 10% deposit would amount to a clog on entering the aforesaid process. ... depth by this Court in Tata Cellular … WebJul 14, 2024 · What is reviewed is not the decision itself but the manner in which it was made. The writ court does not have the expertise to correct such decisions by substituting …
WebFeb 27, 2014 · 93. In Union of India v. Hindustan Development Corpn.6 this Court held thus : (SCC p. 515, para 9) “. the Government had the right to either accept or reject the lowest …
WebIndia Telecomp preferred SLP (C) No. 14266 of 1993. 17. Mr Soli J. Sorabjee, learned counsel for the appellant, Tata Cellular, argues that this is a two-staged tender. In the first … registro brazil japaneseWebMay 16, 2024 · In Tata Cellular v. Union of India. 8. the Hon’ble Supreme Court observed that the principles . of judicial review would apply to the e xercise of contractual powers by Government bodie s in . registro civil 1 tijuanaWebSep 13, 2024 · In Tata Cellular v. Union of India [1] the Court observed that the modern trend points to judicial restraint in administrative action. The same view has been taken in a large number of other decisions also, but it is unfortunate that many courts are not following these decisions and are trying to perform legislative or executive functions. e24.no aksjeliveWebNov 29, 2013 · The scope of judicial review in contractual matters was further examined by this Court in Tata Cellular v. Union Of India . (1994) 6 SCC 651, Raunaq International Ltd. case (1999) 1 SCC 492 and in Jagdish Mandal v. State of Orissa (2007) 14 SCC 517 besides several other decisions to which we need not refer. 11. e23.0 dijagnozaWebDec 26, 2024 · It is to be noted that the decision to award the contract cannot be adjudicated upon by court under judicial review; however, the decision-making process comes within the purview of judicial review. The aforesaid opinion has been observed in the cases of TATA Cellular v. Union of India and Raunaq International Ltd. v. IVR Construction Ltd. and Ors. e23 lavavajillas boschWebIn Tata Cellular v. Union of India , {29} the Supreme Court stipulated that judicial review is concerned with reviewing not the merits of the decision but the decision-making process … e22 givi luggage kit suzuki dr650WebSep 17, 2024 · The bench quoted the following principles laid down in Tata Cellular v. Union of India 1994 SCC (6) 651: (1) The modern trend points to judicial restraint in … registro dcanje